Parity and Out-of-Pocket Spending for Children With High Mental Health or Substance Abuse Expenditures
نویسنده
چکیده
OBJECTIVE: The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act required health plans to provide mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits on par with medical benefits beginning in 2010. Previous research found that parity significantly lowered average out-of-pocket (OOP) spending on MH/SUD treatment of children. No evidence is available on how parity affects OOP spending by families of children with the highest MH/SUD treatment expenditures. METHODS: We used a difference-in-differences study design to examine whether parity reduced families’ (1) share of total MH/SUD treatment expenditures paid OOP or (2) average OOP spending among children whose total MH/SUD expenditures met or exceeded the 90th percentile. By using claims data, we compared changes 2 years before (1999–2000) and 2 years after (2001–2002) the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program implemented parity to a contemporaneous group of health plans that did not implement parity over the same 4-year period. We examined those enrolled in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program because their parity directive is similar to and served as a model for the new federal parity law. RESULTS: Parity led to statistically significant annual declines in the share of total MH/SUD treatment expenditures paid OOP (25%, 95% confidence interval: 26% to 24%) and average OOP spending on MH/ SUD treatment (2$178, 95% confidence interval: 2257 to 297). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first empirical evidence that parity reduces the share and level of OOP spending by families of children with the highest MH/SUD treatment expenditures; however, these spending reductions were smaller than anticipated and unlikely to meaningfully improve families’ financial protection. Pediatrics 2013;131:e903–e911 AUTHORS: Colleen L. Barry, PhD, MPP,a Alyna T. Chien, MD, MS,bc Sharon-Lise T. Normand, PhD,de Alisa B. Busch, MD, MS,dfg Vanessa Azzone, PhD,d Howard H. Goldman, MD, PhD,h and Haiden A. Huskamp, PhDd aDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; bDivision of General Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts; Departments of cGeneral Pediatrics, and dHealth Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; eDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; fMcLean Hospital, Bellmont, Massachusetts; gHealth Services Research Division, Partners Psychiatry and Mental Health; and hDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
منابع مشابه
Parity and out-of-pocket spending for children with high mental health or substance abuse expenditures.
OBJECTIVE The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act required health plans to provide mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits on par with medical benefits beginning in 2010. Previous research found that parity significantly lowered average out-of-pocket (OOP) spending on MH/SUD treatment of children. No evidence is available on how pari...
متن کاملFinancial relief: the effect of state mental health parity laws on families of children with mental health care needs.
Families of children with mental health care needs who live in states with mental health parity laws have lower out-of-pocket spending and are more likely to view their spending as reasonable compared with those living in non parity states. This suggests that mental health parity laws provide important financial benefits to families of children with mental healthcare needs.
متن کاملA bayesian two-part latent class model for longitudinal medical expenditure data: assessing the impact of mental health and substance abuse parity.
In 2001, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management required all health plans participating in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to offer mental health and substance abuse benefits on par with general medical benefits. The initial evaluation found that, on average, parity did not result in either large spending increases or increased service use over the four-year observational period....
متن کاملTrends in mental health insurance benefits and out-of-pocket spending.
BACKGROUND Insurance benefits can have a large effect on whether one is able to access health care services. Mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) insurance coverage has typically been less generous than that of general health services. AIMS OF THE STUDY This paper examines trends in the generosity of private insurance benefits for mental health (MH) services in the United States from 1987...
متن کاملHealth care expenditure in the Islamic Republic of Iran versus other high spending countries
Background: In all countries, health expenditures are a main part of government expenditure, and governments try to find policies and strategies to reduce this expenditure. Overall expenditure index has been raised 30 times during the past 20 years in Iran, while in the health sector, the growth in health expenditures index has been 71 times. The present study aimed at examining health care exp...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013